Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn@null.net)Date: 08/27/02
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Previous message: Jeremy Lawrence: "Enumeration of Users on Win2k"
- In reply to: Edward Elliott: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Next in thread: Tore Lund: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Reply: Tore Lund: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 05:20:07 GMT
Edward Elliott wrote:
> 65,535 characters is plenty for a "run of text".
No, it isn't. I already have applications where that would be an
intolerable limit. And yes, I know plenty of ways to represent
data structures including text.
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Previous message: Jeremy Lawrence: "Enumeration of Users on Win2k"
- In reply to: Edward Elliott: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Next in thread: Tore Lund: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Reply: Tore Lund: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|