Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable
From:Date: 08/26/02
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: TCHAR and buffer overflows"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Maybe in reply to: David Hopwood: "Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Next in thread: Edward Elliott: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Reply: Edward Elliott: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:18:14 GMT
Tore Lund wrote:
> Maybe the strings you have in mind should be considered to be another
> data type. (If, that is, a data type is needed for such strings.) The
> "string" type that we need for displaying and manipulating character
> data was never meant to hold an encyclopedia.
Gee, what was it intended for, if not a representation of a coherent
run of text?
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: TCHAR and buffer overflows"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Maybe in reply to: David Hopwood: "Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Next in thread: Edward Elliott: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Reply: Edward Elliott: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|