Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable
From: Barry Margolin (barmar@genuity.net)Date: 08/23/02
- Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Fixable"
- Previous message: : "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- In reply to: Rahul Dhesi: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Next in thread: David Hopwood: "FIPR web site"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:55:51 GMT
In article <ak65vb$90d$1@samba.rahul.net>,
Rahul Dhesi <c.c.eiftj@23.usenet.us.com> wrote:
>In <ak624j$1g7v3s$1@ID-124507.news.dfncis.de> Tore Lund
><toreld@netscape.net> writes:
>
>>Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>>> In <3D6472A3.F9821234@zetnet.co.uk> David Hopwood
>>> <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk> writes:
>>>
>>>>If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the
>>>>private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory
>>>>Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip
>>>
>>> Do we need special decryption software to view that web site? It's ugly
>>> and indecipherable when viewed with Opera.
>
>>Indeed it is.
Is this tangent based on someone's signature really appropriate to this
thread?
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net Genuity, Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
- Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Fixable"
- Previous message: : "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- In reply to: Rahul Dhesi: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Next in thread: David Hopwood: "FIPR web site"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|