Re: We've been compromised, now what...
From: name@company.comDate: 05/30/02
- Previous message: name@company.com: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- Next in thread: name@company.com: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- Reply: name@company.com: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: name@company.com Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 20:18:16 -0400
On Wed, 29 May 2002 12:23:31 GMT, jcochran at naplesgov dot com (Jeff
Cochran) wrote:
>It's not hard to harden an NT/W2K system, it just doesn't come that
>way. Having all the patches in place leaves a lot of holes open for
>you to hunt down and close.
>
>Jeff
Does anyone have an opinion if the US Navy document on locking down
(actually I think it was a secure install) NT is still of value or
know if it has been updated? TIA.
- Next message: Shawn: "Re: Permissions on C:\WINNT"
- Previous message: name@company.com: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- Next in thread: name@company.com: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- Reply: name@company.com: "Re: We've been compromised, now what..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
