Re: which firewall

From: Berk S. Daemon (someone@somewhere.com)
Date: 05/28/02


From: "Berk S. Daemon" <someone@somewhere.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 19:49:14 GMT


"Brian" <Witch*Dr@usa.nojunkemail.net.ru> wrote in message
news:3cf28722$1@nntp0.pdx.net...
>
> <chris@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:n7s4fucubaspiak5kco9mpognahnnr3kkt@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 27 May 2002 08:28:44 +0200, Peter Larsen
> > <plarsen@mail.tele.dk> wrote:
> > If I had a choice, I would highly recommend using Apache, and have it
> > configured/maintained by someone who knows what they are doing.
> > Unfortunately, I find that most IIS website managers barely know
> > enough to get the site online, much less secure it and keep it
> > secured. On the other hand they do have that shiny MCSE on the
> > wall....
>
> MCSE=Must Consult Someone Experienced

ROFL!



Relevant Pages

  • Re: which firewall
    ... Brian wrote: ... >> If I had a choice, I would highly recommend using Apache, and have it ... >> enough to get the site online, much less secure it and keep it ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: which firewall
    ... Brian wrote: ... >> If I had a choice, I would highly recommend using Apache, and have it ... >> enough to get the site online, much less secure it and keep it ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: which firewall
    ... Brian wrote: ... >> If I had a choice, I would highly recommend using Apache, and have it ... >> enough to get the site online, much less secure it and keep it ...
    (comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security)
  • Re: which firewall
    ... Brian wrote: ... >> If I had a choice, I would highly recommend using Apache, and have it ... >> enough to get the site online, much less secure it and keep it ...
    (comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security)
  • Re: which firewall
    ... >> If I had a choice, I would highly recommend using Apache, and have it ... >> enough to get the site online, much less secure it and keep it ... ROFL! ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)