Re: which firewall

From: FB (nospam@nospam.com)
Date: 05/27/02

  • Next message: black: "Re: which firewall"

    From: FB <nospam@nospam.com>
    Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 23:45:43 +0200
    
    

    Peter Larsen wrote:
    > expendability and for the "what if" of someone taking it over. I have
    > worked in a place where they thought that having a costly firewall and
    > weekly antivirus updates protected them against nimda. After the 5'th
    > nimda infection it became easier to get permission to go to work on
    > another saturday and patch the other third of the servers in the vault,
    > and even then I had some criticism incoming for having also replaced IE
    > 4.00.
    Muhahahaha cool...

    Maybe you should mix some shampoo with whiskey and sell them this magic
    potion for just $150 because it can protect from internet worms.



    Relevant Pages

    • Re: which firewall
      ... > expendability and for the "what if" of someone taking it over. ... > nimda infection it became easier to get permission to go to work on ... > another saturday and patch the other third of the servers in the vault, ... > and even then I had some criticism incoming for having also replaced IE ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: which firewall
      ... > expendability and for the "what if" of someone taking it over. ... > nimda infection it became easier to get permission to go to work on ... > another saturday and patch the other third of the servers in the vault, ... > and even then I had some criticism incoming for having also replaced IE ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: which firewall
      ... > expendability and for the "what if" of someone taking it over. ... > nimda infection it became easier to get permission to go to work on ... > another saturday and patch the other third of the servers in the vault, ... > and even then I had some criticism incoming for having also replaced IE ...
      (comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security)