Re: which firewall
From: chris@nospam.comDate: 05/27/02
- Next message: Peter Larsen: "Re: which firewall"
- Previous message: Lex jansen: "Re: NTFS access rights documentation."
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: which firewall"
- Next in thread: Peter Larsen: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: Peter Larsen: "Re: which firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: chris@nospam.com Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 20:54:09 -0700
On Sun, 26 May 2002 00:49:42 GMT, "Duane Arnold"
<darnold92@Insightbb.com> wrote:
>I have home network using Win2k, IIS and SQL Server 7.0 on one machine. I
>use BlackIce Defender 3.5 on all my machines behind the Linksys router.
>BlackIce protects the network very well. BlackIce has stopped hack attempt
>that got past the Linksys firewall.
>
>Below is a link where you can read the BlackIce specs and download version
>3.5 trial version.
>
>http://www.iss.net/support/documentation/docs.php?product=1&family=3
Big problem everyone here is missing is that a firewall is useless to
protect IIS. You have to let requests through to port 80 right?
Recall that a large majority of the IIS attacks are specially
malformed get requests.
-Chris
- Next message: Peter Larsen: "Re: which firewall"
- Previous message: Lex jansen: "Re: NTFS access rights documentation."
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: which firewall"
- Next in thread: Peter Larsen: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: Peter Larsen: "Re: which firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
