Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!
From: Maxim S. Shatskih (maxim@storagecraft.com)Date: 02/21/02
- Next message: Brian B: "password protecting my web files"
- Previous message: Thomas F. Divine: "Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!"
- In reply to: Bill McKenzie: "Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!"
- Next in thread: Alun Jones: "Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Maxim S. Shatskih" <maxim@storagecraft.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 07:14:33 +0300
> on the whole. And, BTW, looking over the Linux kernel a couple of times
> before, it seems that is the result. If you call Linux code on the whole
> 'good code' I fail to see how you and I can argue anything reasonably.
Note the select()/poll() implementation. People seem to have no notion of encapsulation.
After this, they proudly declare - "if you understand THIS, then you understand how scheduler works!".
Why select() implementor must be aware of scheduler details - is some Linux mystery I cannot understand.
On of the comments in Linux kernel was - "f*ck me gently with a chainsaw!". The surrounding code (the Sparc MMU handling IIRC)
really causes such emotions :-)
I never saw any code from MS which is this quality.
Max
- Next message: Brian B: "password protecting my web files"
- Previous message: Thomas F. Divine: "Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!"
- In reply to: Bill McKenzie: "Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!"
- Next in thread: Alun Jones: "Re: Kiss and say goodbye to Microsoft!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|