Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- From: Walter Mautner <nodeleaf.20.eatallspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:32:23 +0100
s. keeling wrote:
Ditto, and I'm not into this deeply myself. I just think if the law
goes the cracker's way, the law's wrong. Getting away with cracking
other's boxes because you couldn't see the login banner, which every
legitimate user would see, is just plain wrong. It *has* to be legal
Well, there must be some "criminal energy" involved to get in. A honeypot
should be firewalled or password-protected the same way (but obviously
different ports, different passwords) as the protected box/network.
If it is possible to "break in" without effort, there is no break-in in
fact.
to secure access to your systems, else they're not really yours.Agreed.
Surveilling/logging *what's hitting on your network* has to be part of
that.
--
vista policy violation: Microsoft optical mouse found penguin patterns
on mousepad. Partition scan in progress to remove offending
incompatible products. Reactivate MS software.
Linux 2.6.22.9-1mdvcustom [LinuxCounter#295241,ICQ#4918962]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- From: s. keeling
- Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- From: Unruh
- Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- References:
- Honeypots Illegal?
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- From: PedroArthur_JEdi
- Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- From: s. keeling
- Honeypots Illegal?
- Prev by Date: Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- Next by Date: Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- Previous by thread: Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- Next by thread: Re: Honeypots Illegal?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|