Re: Most secure web server
- From: "Nico" <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jan 2007 00:09:31 -0800
Geoff wrote:
Thanks for the advice guys!
On Jan 7, 1:45 am, Ertugrul Soeylemez <n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Geoff" <hotf...@xxxxxxxxx> (07-01-06 05:55:40):
Does anyone have any advice in choosing the most secure web serverconfiguration parser, and a server socket (maybe a few more things).
possible? Apache is often used, but has many features which are not
needed. Being heavy-weight is more likely to introduce exploits. What
do you think of any alternatives to apache or am I wrong to think this
about Apache?The Apache core itself is just a simple implementation of HTTP, a
Even multitasking is a separate feature. So take Ken's advice, and
don't load modules for features you don't need.
A lot has been left out: Apache is fully featured: there are tools
available for all sorts of things which you may not need (such as PHP
and MySQL) and for things that are very useful for security (such as
SSL, and local Kerberos authentication). Using a good webserver is not
enough to be secure: I highly recommend goiing over what you need with
someone comfortable with your particular server to walk you through the
booby traps.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Most secure web server
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: Most secure web server
- References:
- Most secure web server
- From: Geoff
- Re: Most secure web server
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: Most secure web server
- From: Geoff
- Most secure web server
- Prev by Date: Best Socks tool for RedHat Enterprise 4
- Next by Date: Re: pdf digital signature under linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Most secure web server
- Next by thread: Re: Most secure web server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|