Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:14:42 -0700
On 2006-10-26, C. J. Clegg <reply.in.group@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One other question... If I try to upgrade this server to Fedora Core 5,
I'm going to be in for a very big fight (don't ask <sigh>).
I don't mind fighting the fight if it will be truly worth it, so my
question is ... is there any aspect of FC2 that is inherently dangerous
and insecure that got fixed by the time FC5 came out?
Seems unlikely, but if this machine is supposed to be a server-class
machine, you might consider using something more along the lines of
CentOS. Fedora is intended to be more bleeding-edge, and so may not be
quite as stable and well-tested as CentOS (well, tested by proxy,
anyway, through RHEL). You could probably get away with minor
patches to FC2, but I would not take my word for it, as I'm not a Fedora
user.
--keith
--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- From: C. J. Clegg
- Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- References:
- Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- From: C. J. Clegg
- Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- From: left_coast
- Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- From: C. J. Clegg
- Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- Next by Date: Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- Next by thread: Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|