Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: "Barton L. Phillips" <barton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:52:13 GMT
Allodoxaphobia wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:16:27 GMT, Barton L. Phillips wrote:Yes sorry that was not really what I was trying to say. You are right of course, and I do other analysis to try to see what "bad" bots are doing. I think buck's program might help as log files are quite hard to analyze for this type of violation.In reality I have not seen any problems relating to bots. I check my logs for user agents and look at who/what is reading my robots.txt and have not seen anything that alarmed me to date.
Errr, ummm. Bad bots probably won't bother reading robots.txt.
Jonesy
--
----------------
Barton L. Phillips
Applied Technology Resources, Inc.
Tel: (818)652-9850
Web: http://www.applitec.com
.
- References:
- robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: caveman
- Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: Dave {Reply Address In.sig}
- Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: Barton L. Phillips
- Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: Dave {Reply Address In.sig}
- Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: Barton L. Phillips
- Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- From: Allodoxaphobia
- robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- Prev by Date: Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- Next by Date: Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- Previous by thread: Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- Next by thread: Re: robots.txt: Good, Bad, Ugly?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|