Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: responder <no@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:30:51 -0400
Jay C. James wrote:
*yawn*
Acknowledge your negative response. I will only respond to one (2) other
of the 169 lines of your message.
My relatively brief posting history has been nothing but positive, and
will continue to be that way.
So it can be assumed that you do consider this last message to be
positive? You have surely excoriated me, but I don't believe you have
convinced me of anything of great importance, except that I did irritate
you.
Sorry that you are unhappy.
.
- References:
- Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: John
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: Jay C. James
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: responder
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: Jay C. James
- Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Prev by Date: Re: Update #2 - Re: Google Bobbles NSA wiretap searches
- Next by Date: encrypted file system
- Previous by thread: Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Next by thread: Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|