Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: responder <no@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:49:50 -0400
Jay C. James wrote:
"John" <John@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.12.13.39.23.788992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The following describes a significant security hole in Diebold votingJohn seriously, this is USENET, not RSS. Please give more information
machines.
http://politics.slashdot.org/politics/06/05/12/1228203.shtml
with your posts.
Jay C. James seriously, what's the problem here? Oh, I see:
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
For a lot of us on this ng, just clicking on the link brings up the full
story in our browsers. If you object to blindly clicking on links (a
valid objection) we just highlight the link text and paste it with a
middle click into our browser (not IE) URL bar.
Hey Jay C. James, (see how easy I can copy and paste?), he told you what
the story was about. OK (Deep sigh)
==============================
Critical Security Hole Found in Diebold Machines Posted by Zonk on Friday
May 12, @09:13AM from the want-my-money-back dept.
United States Security Software Politics ckswift writes "From security
expert Bruce Schneier's blog, a major security hole has been found in
Diebold voting machines." From the article: "The hole is considered more
worrisome than most security problems discovered on modern voting
machines, such as weak encryption, easily pickable locks and use of the
same, weak password nationwide. Armed with a little basic knowledge of
Diebold voting systems and a standard component available at any computer
store, someone with a minute or two of access to a Diebold touch screen
could load virtually any software into the machine and disable it,
redistribute votes or alter its performance in myriad ways."
Feel better now?
Here's another link, which is to a pdf format paper (redacted version)
that described the vulnerabilities. (Or should they be called security
faults? Maybe threats to our governments?)
You are posting from a Texas Instruments. If you can read NNTP from work,
why can't you just take your IE over to the given URL and read the story,
or not?
Jay C. James seriously, this is USENET, not kindergarten. Get with the
program. Please. If you want to read a Linux ng from work with IE, at
least have the courtesy to not complain about your browser.
This is a serious security issue that affects voting and our our future
(and present?) governing officials may be. I am sure that if you are
serious, you want good elections as much as anyone else does.
If you are really a patriotic US American (or Canadian, I guess) please
take this somewhat seriously and quit complaining. The man did the right
thing and I for one appreciate it. If you can't live with that kind of
thing, then politely and please take your adolescent NNTP attitude back to
the microsoft newsgroups and let us talk about more serious things without
interruption. Please and thank you very much. Now go away. Please. And
Thank You.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: Jay C. James
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: Unruh
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- References:
- Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: John
- Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- From: Jay C. James
- Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Prev by Date: Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Next by Date: Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Previous by thread: Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Next by thread: Re: Diebold Voting Machines - Security Hole
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|