Re: is this webpage secure?
From: Peter Pearson (ppearson_at_nowhere.invalid)
Date: 11/29/05
- Next message: Proteus: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Previous message: Jeffrey F. Bloss: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- In reply to: Newsbox: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Next in thread: Proteus: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:33:21 -0800
Newsbox wrote:
> The question that remains in my mind is why anyone would bother with the
> additional complexities involved in doing so, along with all the new
> possible sources of error and insecurity, especially for a simple login
> page. I'm sure those who write these pages have their reasons, but it
> seems like a bad idea to me.
I agree that straightforward tends to be better. I believe
the motivation is saving the processing power that would
be spent setting up secure sessions for people who come to
the login page but do not log in.
-- Peter Pearson To get my email address, substitute: nowhere -> spamcop, invalid -> net
- Next message: Proteus: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Previous message: Jeffrey F. Bloss: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- In reply to: Newsbox: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Next in thread: Proteus: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
