Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?
From: Grant (g_r_a_n_t__at_dodo.com.au)
Date: 10/07/05
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- In reply to: Lew Pitcher: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- Next in thread: Moe Trin: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 07:54:16 +1000
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:17:34 -0400, Lew Pitcher <Lew.Pitcher@td.com> wrote:
>
>FWIW, my firewall rules explicitly DROP any packets from the internet to
>my LAN that don't meet my requirements for passage (ie trying to access
>priviledged ports, coming from a blacklisted IP address, etc).
Yes, I have a blacklist too, just DROP 'em, part of reducing traffic
from stupid web-crawlers, drop by entire 'whois' CIDR block.
>
>OTOH, my firewall rules explicitly REJECT any packets from my LAN to the
>internet that don't meet my requirements for passage (i.e. trying to
>send to a private IP range or trying to send one of the ICMP messages
>I've blacklisted).
Was under impression one could only _drop_ ICMPs, not reject them,
per RFC <mumble>.
As far as rejecting goes, when I tested various reject options I found
some types of reject message types do increase unwanted traffic, the
current 'be reasonable then drop' workings has been in place for some
time, I become less aware of the firewall needing change.
Grant.
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- In reply to: Lew Pitcher: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- Next in thread: Moe Trin: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: iptables: DROP or REJECT?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|