Re: 72.14.207.104
From: Newsbox (nospam_for_me_please_at_thanks.invalid)
Date: 06/16/05
- Previous message: Spyro: "Re: New Security Distro site"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Angela Kahealani: "Re: 72.14.207.104"
- Next in thread: Robert Glueck: "Re: 72.14.207.104"
- Reply: Robert Glueck: "Re: 72.14.207.104"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 02:49:19 -0400
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:31:11 -1000, Angela Kahealani wrote:
> Newsbox wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Google.Com owns the address...
>
> $ man man
> $ man whois
You are right and I checked it. You are correct that whois proved more
informative than reverse DNS lookup, and the address in question is owned
by google. What I found next might be of general interest.
It appears that where I am, DNS for google.com resolves to 216.239.39.99,
both from my ISP's DNS servers and from GOOGLE's (and consistently). So
when my browser sends a get to 216.239.39.99, and the firewall sees an ACK
from 72.14.207.104, perhaps the firewall is doing exactly what it is
supposed to do by LOGging and DROPping that ACK packet. When I put
"216.239.39.99" into the location bar everything works beautifully. But
when I put in "google.com" it times out, and I get hits from 72.14.207.104.
As an additional factor, I'm still receiving unsolicited traffic from
72.14.207.104 at random times even when I am not attempting to connect to
google.
I'll look into this some more, and very much appreciate your quick (<15
minutes) and knowledgeable help. I think I'm beginning to feel better
now. Thanks again.
- Previous message: Spyro: "Re: New Security Distro site"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Angela Kahealani: "Re: 72.14.207.104"
- Next in thread: Robert Glueck: "Re: 72.14.207.104"
- Reply: Robert Glueck: "Re: 72.14.207.104"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|