Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info
From: Bev A. Kupf (bevakupf_at_myhome.net)
Date: 04/26/05
- Next message: Menno Duursma: "Re: Password Less SSH to Cisco Router"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- In reply to: Mike: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Next in thread: Baho Utot: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Reply: Baho Utot: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Reply: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:09:01 GMT
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:04:53 +0100,
Mike (honey@michaelmoyse.co.uk) wrote:
> Newsbox wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:26:27 -0400, Newsbox wrote:
>> You could be subject to civil and criminal penalties if your 24/7
>> connected box is used as a relay to harm other people. Do not REPEAT: DO
>> NOT discount the reality that enforcers armed with the patriot act could
>> and may put you in prison or could and may put you to death.
> Only in America could you be put to death for letting your computer send
> spam! Lets invade and free the oppressed millions! ;-)
Methinks that Newsbox is being overly dramatic. However, I do
agree with his sentiment that it is best to take a compromised
box off the net, (particulary when the compromise is unknown).
Beverly
-- Many a smale maketh a grate -- Geoffrey Chaucer
- Next message: Menno Duursma: "Re: Password Less SSH to Cisco Router"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- In reply to: Mike: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Next in thread: Baho Utot: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Reply: Baho Utot: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Reply: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: Still after the apache spammer, more info"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]