Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security
From: Darko Gavrilovic (dgavrilovicAThushmailDOTcom)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: wcb: "Biometric devices - fingerprint authorization"
- Previous message: Stachu 'Dozzie' K.: "Re: enables access to .config"
- In reply to: HansF: "Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security"
- Next in thread: HansF: "Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security"
- Reply: HansF: "Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:05:42 -0600
HansF <News.Hans@telus.net> wrote in
news:pan.2005.03.30.12.17.35.393535@telus.net:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:26:32 +0000, Chris Mewton wrote:
>
>> Can someone advise if RH ES3.0 is secure enough out of the box to
>> perform ecommerce function without being behind a seperate firewall?
>> I guess yes, but have been told no.
>> regards
>>
>
> Since there have been patches written to ES3; since patches continue
> to be written; and since the statement implies that no one will be
> looking for and applying patches; IMO, the answer is NO.
Hi. Other than patching, I think the OP is asking, can he/she assume that
the default setup as released by Red Hat is secure without him/her having
to go through the different settings and start hardening the security
settings.
I don't use RedHat, but I assume that at the very least you will have to
go through and start looking at the different services running and start
disabling what you don't need.
-- "Why do they call it rush hour when nothing moves?", Robin Williams
- Next message: wcb: "Biometric devices - fingerprint authorization"
- Previous message: Stachu 'Dozzie' K.: "Re: enables access to .config"
- In reply to: HansF: "Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security"
- Next in thread: HansF: "Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security"
- Reply: HansF: "Re: Red Hat ES3.0 Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|