Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs

From: Mike (NoSpam_at_NoSpam.net)
Date: 10/04/04


Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:06:39 -0400

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:05:53 +0200, Daniel Mewes <danielmewes@web.de>
wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>It is an often used argument that Linux/Unix machines are not affected by
>viruses, because most users do not work as root.
>
> blah... blah... blah

Wasn't this posted once before very recently? Why the need to repost?



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs
    ... Daniel Mewes writes: ... ]It is an often used argument that Linux/Unix machines are not affected by ... No linux machines are not affected by viruses because most viruses (or ... Secondarily, yes, most work is done as user not root. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs
    ... Daniel Mewes writes: ... >It is an often used argument that Linux/Unix machines are not affected by ... >viruses, because most users do not work as root. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs
    ... Daniel Mewes writes: ... >It is an often used argument that Linux/Unix machines are not affected by ... >viruses, because most users do not work as root. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Why are there few viruses for UNIX/Linux systems?
    ... which often run as root. ... Viruses, which tend to enter ... ] some clue about system security. ... students screw themselves as badly as others if they crash the machine. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: [AntiVirus + Ubuntu] was - Re: And another Ubuntu convert!
    ... run some linux distro or other, and there's not exactly an epidemic. ... making statements such as "no known viruses exist in the wild" ... This is where the difference comes in between Windows and *NIX OS's. ... The thing with Linux "viruses" is that the majority of them must be run as 'root' for them to do any real damage. ...
    (Ubuntu)