Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs
From: Daniel Mewes (danielmewes_at_web.de)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: Daniel Mewes: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Previous message: stephen: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- In reply to: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 06:22:37 +0200
Bev A. Kupf wrote:
>
> What was posted is no virus - it has no mechanism for
> propagation, or to attach itself to other files.
>
It attaches to source trees...
Regards,
Daniel Mewes
- Next message: Daniel Mewes: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Previous message: stephen: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- In reply to: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|