Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs
From: Gandalf Parker (gandalf_at_most.of.my.favorite.sites)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: John Thompson: "Re: newbie virus question"
- Previous message: Gandalf Parker: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- In reply to: Stachu 'Dozzie' K.: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:44:15 GMT
"Stachu 'Dozzie' K." <dozzie@dynamit.im.pwr.wroc.pl.nospam> wrote in
news:cjhqu0$qj8$11@news.dialog.net.pl:
> Let me explain if you really don't know what is "kill filling". There is
> a so-named killfile, which contains patterns. If post matches one of
> these patterns it isn't displayed to killfile's owner. In simple words:
> he will ignore all your posts.
>
Or actualy, he wont even see them to ignore them
Gandalf Parker
- Next message: John Thompson: "Re: newbie virus question"
- Previous message: Gandalf Parker: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- In reply to: Stachu 'Dozzie' K.: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]