Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs
From: Kasper Dupont (kasperd_at_daimi.au.dk)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Previous message: Stachu 'Dozzie' K.: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- In reply to: Daniel Mewes: "Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Next in thread: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Reply: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:06:28 +0200
Daniel Mewes wrote:
>
> Name: infect.sh
> infect.sh Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> Encoding: 8Bit
I knew something like that would be possible, but I'm
still surprised it could be that simple. The quality
of your code is not perfect, but it is good enough for
a proof of concept. I did not try to run it, just
looked through the code and I think I understand how
it works. It could be improved in a few ways which
would make it harder to spot. And BTW I think you
should find somebody a litle better at english than
you and me to proofread the disclaimer.
-- Kasper Dupont
- Next message: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Previous message: Stachu 'Dozzie' K.: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- In reply to: Daniel Mewes: "Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Next in thread: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Reply: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Unix NOT secure against Viruses on home PCs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|