comp.os.linux.security
By messages with attachments
390 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Starting: 08/31/04
Ending: 09/30/04
- Re: SPF is harmful, on track for being patented by Microsoft, *and* supported by our Spammer-In-Residence. Sam (09/25/04)
- Re: SPF is harmful, on track for being patented by Microsoft, *and* supported by our Spammer-In-Residence. Sam (09/25/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF is harmful, on track for being patented by Microsoft, *and* Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF is harmful, on track for being patented by Microsoft, *and* supported by our Spammer-In-Residence. Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/24/04)
- Re: 'http://spf.pobox.com' (was: Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework) Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/23/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/22/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/22/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/22/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/21/04)
- Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework Sam (09/20/04)
Last message date: 09/30/04
Archived on: 09/30/04 CEST
390 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]