Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework
From: Mark Marcus (mark_at_agentnews.sales.xhome.us)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Previous message: Gandalf Parker: "Re: defense against password cracking programs"
- In reply to: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Next in thread: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Reply: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 06:55:48 -0700
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:43:35 +0200, "Alexander W. Skwar"
<from@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
>Maurice Janssen wrote:
>> In comp.os.linux.security, Alexander W. Skwar wrote:
>>
>>>Well, the envelope should match the headers. If there's a
>>>
>>>To: foo@serverA
>>>
>>>the envelope should contain
>>>
>>>RCPT TO foo@serverA
>>
>>
>> What if I send an email to someone@domain1.net with a CC to
>> somebody@domain2.net. The mail will be deliverd to the MX of
>> domain2.net with RCPT TO somebody@domain2.net while the To: header in
>> the DATA phase says To: someone@domain1.net.
>
>Well, you will deliver two mails.
>
>Server1:
>RCPT TO: someone@domain1
>To: someone@domain1
>Cc: somebody@domain2
>
>Server2:
>RCPT TO: somebody@domain2
>To: someone@domain1
>Cc: somebody@domain2
>
>> Ergo: no match.
>
>Wrong.
>
>Alexander Skwar
This is where those two problems come up: BCC and Groups/Mailing
Lists. Suppose that someone belong to a mailing list called "Stock
Automobiles"
RCPT TO someone@domain1
DATA
To: Stock Automobiles
No match, right? One can argue "well all they have to do is expand
the Group List..." but then that violates the inherent privacy for all
the members of the list and loses the information that the target was
the list.
Also consider the BCC:
RCPT TO someone@domain1
DATA
To: someone2@domain2
The argument I've heard was "well, don't use BCC." But that loses
functionality as described in RFC 822, RFC 2821, etc.
So like I said before, although the SMTP protocol can support this
type of matching, it really isn't workable. (By the way, we can't
translate BCC:'s to TO:'s because that flies in the face of RFC 2821).
Mark Marcus
Protect Your Email Address and Make Money too!
http://www.xhome.org My Sales Code is 22819
- Next message: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Previous message: Gandalf Parker: "Re: defense against password cracking programs"
- In reply to: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Next in thread: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Reply: Alexander W. Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|