Re: Advanced Security Question
From: Dale Dellutri (ddelQQQlutr_at_panQQQix.com)
Date: 08/13/04
- Next message: Seena: "My Redhat 9.0 was just hacked to death - help"
- Previous message: Abdullah Ramazanoglu: "Re: Advanced Security Question"
- In reply to: Hammer: "Advanced Security Question"
- Next in thread: Skylar Thompson: "Re: Advanced Security Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:26:54 +0000 (UTC)
On 11 Aug 2004 18:20:52 -0700, Hammer <hammeraus001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is either a stupid question or will only be
> available sometime in the late 24th century. Here goes...
> Does anyone know how I would set a switched network to direct ALL
> traffic through a linux box for authorisation, authentication, IDS and
> logging. I could use RADIUS, but I've heard there are some flaws with
> it.
> Basically this box is going to check every packet on the network, log
> it, check for "unwanted" activity and/or authorise it. It's going to
> be acting in a super cop role, between clients, secure servers,
> unsecure servers and Internet connection via firewall. Yes - it's a
> firewall and DMZ, but to a greater extent.
> I want any new machines to be denied access to anything until they are
> authorised. I also want to stop all traffic between clients, unless
> through the linux box.
> Would IP tables on clients, servers and linux authentication box be
> able to do this? Client Ip tables only allow traffic to
> authentication server. Server Ip tables only allow traffic between
> authorised servers and authentication server. Authentication server
> only allow authorised traffic between itself and client/servers
> (server traffic dependant upon server role). This sounds logical, but
> could it be done?
One way to do this: get rid of the network switch and use a linux
system as the switch. It would have to have as many ethernet ports as
the original switch, and you'd need a specialized iptables and other
software, but it could be done.
Alternatively, get a network switch that allows all of what you need.
Perhaps some high-end Cisco or HP Procurve switch? Or perhaps a
WatchGuard or other firewall/vpn/security switch?
I think you'll find it difficult to control the entire network's
traffic unless you do it at the switch.
-- Dale Dellutri <ddelQQQlutr@panQQQix.com> (lose the Q's)
- Next message: Seena: "My Redhat 9.0 was just hacked to death - help"
- Previous message: Abdullah Ramazanoglu: "Re: Advanced Security Question"
- In reply to: Hammer: "Advanced Security Question"
- Next in thread: Skylar Thompson: "Re: Advanced Security Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|