Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?
From: Gary Petersen (turnabout-is_at_fair-play.optinrealbig.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Thor Kottelin: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Previous message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- In reply to: Craig Macbride: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:15:32 GMT
T'was like the singing of the angels themselves when Craig Macbride said:
> [...]
>>Stickman answered me : "Unfortunately, using the hosts file to block
>>unwanted content is terribly inefficient."
>>Why is that ?
>
> A number of reasons:
> * You have to list every host separately, an impossibly long task.
> * If your local machine doesn't run a web server, the references to
> 127.0.0.1 will take ages to time out, quite possibly taking longer
> than just loading the ad banners in the first place!
Untrue. I have a hosts file installed, and connections to localhost
fail immediately.
> [...]
> * If your local machine does run a web server, pages may not display
> nicely with missing parts.
> [...]
They display very nicely and much more quickly with the ads missing.
Cheers
- Next message: Thor Kottelin: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Previous message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- In reply to: Craig Macbride: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|