Re: Iptables Question
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0_at_gmx.co.uk)
Date: 03/19/04
- Next message: Julia Thorne: "Re: FTP Authentication."
- Previous message: Chris McHugh: "Iptables Question"
- In reply to: Chris McHugh: "Iptables Question"
- Next in thread: Alexander Harsch: "Re: Iptables Question"
- Reply: Alexander Harsch: "Re: Iptables Question"
- Reply: Chris: "Re: Iptables Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:36:18 -0600
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:27:44 -0500, Chris McHugh wrote:
> iptables -L shows a lot of Accept and Drops under Chain INPUT (policy
iptables -L is useless. With -v it's a bit better, but only
iptables-save shows you your exact rules.
> Does this invalidate all the other settings and do what it looks like it
> does? I did not put it there.
Any rules processed before this mystery rule are not affected. No, most
likely it does not do what it looks like. There's probably some kind of
condition, like a protocol.
Finally, yes, you probably DID put it there. :)
-- /dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply
- Next message: Julia Thorne: "Re: FTP Authentication."
- Previous message: Chris McHugh: "Iptables Question"
- In reply to: Chris McHugh: "Iptables Question"
- Next in thread: Alexander Harsch: "Re: Iptables Question"
- Reply: Alexander Harsch: "Re: Iptables Question"
- Reply: Chris: "Re: Iptables Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|