Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?
From: Bill Unruh (unruh_at_string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 02/28/04
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- Previous message: Mike Kent: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
NeoSadist <neosad1st@charter.net> writes:
]Carlos Moreno wrote:
]>
]> What's that about?
]>
]> I mean, I read the article, and it truly terrifies me that
]> basically all Linux distributions are going to include it.
]>
]> I mean, who are we kidding... The NSA?? Out of the goodness
]> of their soul are interested in improving the security of
]> other people's Linux machines?
Uh, it is open source. YOu can look at what they have added. You can
decide for yourself whether they are being nasty. Or if not you, pleanty
of people would love to be able to show that theyare playing games.
You still have not learned the advantage of open source. "Many eyes make
all bugs shallow" can also be used when the bugs are deliberate.
]>
]> I don't think I can find words to describe at what level is
]> "smells fishy" an understatement in this case.
]>
]> I guess that being that the code is available and all, it
]> can be scrutinized by the public... That's in principle
]> good news, but I can't get over the impossibility of the
]> NSA contributing to enhance other people's security...
NSAs whole mission is the security of the USA. While it may be that
your, and their definition of security may diverge at times,
nevertheless that is what they see as their mission.
]> It's practically an oxymoron... It's like Microsoft
]> donating one billion dollars to the OSDL without any
]> conditions at all.
]>
]> Plus, I'm sure that code could be full of obscure and
]> obfuscated trickery to set up back doors; so, even being
]> open source, there may be "evil" things that go unnoticed.
]> (there is always the "conspiracy theory" that the DES was
]> designed with "mysterious" values for the S-Boxes that
]> have a "magical" key that breaks it -- or whatever, not
]> necessarily a particular key)
And no evidence for this has ever emerged. In fact it is NSA influence
which seems to have strengthened DES against attacks not known in the
open literature at the time.
I could imagine that you are actually a plant from North Korean security
services, with equally non-existant evidence. While paranoia may be
useful as a motivator sometimes, its theories must still be backed by
evidence.
]>
]> Yes, I know I may sound overparanoid... But, let's face
]> it: the NSA? There is no such thing as being too paranoid
]> when we're talking about the NSA.
]>
There is always such a thing as being overparanoid about anything,
whether NSA, Al Qaida, or aliens.
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- Previous message: Mike Kent: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: NSA enhancing Linux security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|