Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security
From: Sam Joharay (public_viewer_at_indiatimes.com)
Date: 02/11/04
- Next message: Keith Keller: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 11 Feb 2004 08:18:31 -0800
Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote in message news:<ev9pf1-03u.ln1@grendel.myth>...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10 Feb 2004 20:54:19 -0800,
> Sam Joharay <public_viewer@indiatimes.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A friend of mine pointed this out to me
> > (which I believe must be common knowledge
> > though I'm kinda surprised by it):
> >
> > Claim: If you have physical access to a linux
> > machine, you can gain root access. Furthermore
> > you can create a user with any name which will
> > have root access (thus leave a backdoor entry
> > for remote root access).
> >
> > How to: Reboot the PC. Hit Ctrl-X when the login
> > screen appears. You will get a command prompt
> > that says "boot:"
> > Type "linux 1"
> >
> > Once thus logged in, you have permissions to edit
> > all files. Edit /etc/passwd and add line:
> >
> > myuser::0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
> >
> > Save file and exit (logout/reboot).
> > Now you have created a user with user name myuser
> > which has root privileges (try it).
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> > I want to know whether:
> >
> > a. this is a well known security flaw
> > b. if there is someway to prevent this.
> > c. is there anything that distinguishes a user thus
> > created from the root user (in terms of privileges)
> >
> >=============================================
> >
> > If the claim is true (I have tried it on the redhat
> > linux installation that I have) then IMHO, it means
> > that a linux machine is only as secure as the lock
> > that guards it.
> >
> > Please comment,
> > [Sam Jo]
>
>
> it's the same with any machine, if you have physical access, it's
> vulnerable. The OS is irrelevent. You can do the same thing with any
> version of MS-Windows.
>
Well, I did say that this must be common knowledge so I cant
understand some of the comments in earlier posts that go
"So what? ..."
The only point being made is that is it *that easy*? I would
imagine servers in any place being physically guarded, but
what about machines of individual users.. someone could just
walk up to my PC while I'm at lunch and add a root user in less
than 5 minutes.
Also could you tell how this is possible in Windows too? (I'm
talking of a simple procedure like the above which can be
carried out in a short time without requring the 'hacker' to
posses any addl software)
[Sam Jo]
- Next message: Keith Keller: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: (newbie) Question about core linux security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|