Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0_at_gmx.co.uk)
Date: 01/28/04
- Next message: Joerg Dolle: "GnuPG - commandline parameters for batch use"
- Previous message: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- In reply to: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- Next in thread: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- Reply: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:03:31 -0800
In article <bv8ovi$phbhn$1@ID-47665.news.uni-berlin.de>,
Gregor Ries wrote:
> NeoSadist wrote:
>> Experience: fat32 is insecure and has lots of virii that can attack it.
>> Advice: find a different way to do what you need without using FAT32.
>>
> You are completely right - but I need to have dataexchange on one
Is he? This is news to me. What can a virus do to a FAT32 filesystem?
What vulnerabilities are specific to FAT32 (or to any type of DOS
filesystem, for that matter)?
Yes, it could be erased if some viral code executes under a DOS or
Windows OS. It could similarly be erased using "rm -rf /path-to/vfat"!
This has nothing to do with the filesystem!
> computersystem - and for this fat 32 is the only solution I know....
Let's nip the FUD in the bud.
FAT filesystems are well-supported under just about any OS you might
care to use -- MS's forced-upgrade policies for Win95 retail and WinNT
notwithstanding. There is absolutely nothing wrong from a security
standpoint with FAT32 (the vfat driver in Linux.) Simply be aware that
DOS filesystems are too primitive to support ownership and permission
attributes.
> So if you have nevertheless an idea for such unsecure filesystem...
IIRC from your OP, your answers should all be found in the man pages for
mount(8) and fstab(5).
-- /dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply
- Next message: Joerg Dolle: "GnuPG - commandline parameters for batch use"
- Previous message: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- In reply to: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- Next in thread: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- Reply: Gregor Ries: "Re: security problem with fat32 on suse 9.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|