Re: Embarassing...
From: erik (erik_at_geenspam.vanwesten.net)
Date: 12/04/03
- Next message: Gorik Vanderreken: "Re: Serious Vulnerability in Linux Kernel"
- Previous message: Lione: "Looking for a pass checking program"
- In reply to: Michael: "Embarassing..."
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: Embarassing..."
- Reply: Mike: "Re: Embarassing..."
- Reply: Michael: "Re: Embarassing..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:27:24 +0100
Michael wrote:
> Well, there's no easy way to put it so I'll just say it....my server
> got
> hacked by a Turkish citizen. The server has been replaced with a new
> one
> and the infected one is now sitting in my living room. What I want to
> know
> is....what went wrong? I consider myself pretty thorough and safe. I
> know I've made some mistakes, but I take pride in my work and I'm
> pretty deflated
> that this happened to me. Anyway, here's a list of services that I
> had running that would answer to an outside (non-localhost) request:
>
> Linux 2.4.17
> ProFTPd 1.2.2rc2
> Apache 1.3.23
> OpenSSH 3.1p1
> ircD 2.10
> Bind 9.2.1
> Sendmail 8.12.10
> QPopper 4.0.3
> UW IMAP4rev1 2001.292
>
> I looked for security notices that I missed for each one and the only
> one I could find that might cause this was a local user elevation bug
> in the Linux
> kernel. Maybe I gave too many friends a local account and didn't
> enforce
> password rules strongly enough. I really do hope that that was the
> problem, but...did I miss a security notice?
>
> The only other note that I'd like to add is that the ircD required a
> strong password to log into and was designed for a web based chat
> program that ran
> on the web server. In other words, it wasn't a public IRC server.
>
> From just looking at the above list, does anyone see what I messed up
> on?
>
Quickly reading: at the very least: apache (1.3.28), openssh (3.7p1),
proftpd (1.2.9), sendmail (8.12.0) are extremely velunerable. Between
() are the current versions. To my knowledge all of these were updated
because they had root exploitable vulnerabilities.
I do not know where you did your reading, but that list is not up to
date.
EJ
-- Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address. http://www.vanwesten.net for examples of ipf and pf.
- Next message: Gorik Vanderreken: "Re: Serious Vulnerability in Linux Kernel"
- Previous message: Lione: "Looking for a pass checking program"
- In reply to: Michael: "Embarassing..."
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: Embarassing..."
- Reply: Mike: "Re: Embarassing..."
- Reply: Michael: "Re: Embarassing..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|