Re: Openssh security

From: Bill Unruh (unruh_at_string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 09/29/03 

Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:19:08 +0000 (UTC)

Linux <linux@nospam.invalid> writes:

]> Imagine if we replaced "sendmail" with "cat".
]>

]Why do that when one could just choose qmail, which does this correctly
]already.

Uh, this thread is discussing ssh, and qmail is an attrocious
replacement for ssh.
Yes, I know the previous poster mentioned sendmail, but it was only as
an absurd example.1

...
]I'm not sure what your point is?
Nor sure what yours is.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Openssh security
    ... Linux writes: ... Uh, this thread is discussing ssh, and qmail is an attrocious ... an absurd example.1 ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Automated SSH login attempts? Related Cross post from incidents.org
    ... [Intrusions] Linux SSH scanning - test/guest ... There is also a multithreaded SSH bruteforcer called "haita" ... Automated SSH login attempts? ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: SSH server with SBC DSL and DynDNS
    ... > I'm thinking about getting SBC DSL service, ... > be able to log into one of my Linux boxes using SSH. ... I have used a broadband router with dynamic SBC DSL, ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: [SLE] [General] Rules for firewall?
    ... > One Linux server with NFS ... except the windows boxes unless you run cgywin ... > The firewall is to be locked down for user login only via ssh. ... > Any pointers on where to start learning? ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: mail server setup questions
    ... I just realised that qmail appears over and over in Linux distros, ... and I suspect that the reason it has such a following in the ... For those people I recommend Courier. ...
    (freebsd-questions)