Re: new unpublished SSH exploit ?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:49:43 -0500
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 04:37:02 GMT, Nico Kadel-Garcia
>David Magda wrote:
>> firstname.lastname@example.org (Darren Tucker) writes:
>>>OpenSSH 3.7 (and 3.7p1) were released a couple of hours ago. The
>>>announcement does not appear to have hit the list archives yet.
>> There is also a patch available if you do not want to upgrade to a
>> newer version (which can change other behaviour):
>It got slashdotted earlier today: RedHat has already published updated
>RPM's for their more recent OS releases, since the patch is quite small
FWIW, Redhat has updated the updated RPMs for openssh today (9/17).
- Re: redhat patch problem?
... I've since successfully migrated all of my legacy redhat OS's ... As far as i know this method can not be used to upgrade to RHEL ... > you can use in lieu of fedoralegacy. ... I guess that fedoralegacy doesn't any patch any more after ...
- Re: new unpublished SSH exploit ?
... On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 04:37:02 GMT, Nico Kadel-Garcia ... >> There is also a patch available if you do not want to upgrade to a ... >RPM's for their more recent OS releases, since the patch is quite small ... Redhat has updated the updated RPMs for openssh today. ...
- Re: To Anyone who has Internet Explorer Installed or any other browser (Everybody)
... >> patch the affected versions. ... This much is known about Microsoft: ... when they do, it is often as a part of a forced "upgrade", ... DRM scheme than to build in fundamental flaws, ...
- Re: Liveupgrade and ZFS: Not for workstations!
... I can't use live upgrade to ... Or you can create a new BE and patch that, ... If I'm adding patches that don't require single user mode or a reboot, I just take s snapshot of the pool and patch. ... second disk for one reason or another. ...
- Re: Patching Solaris 9 systems to "current"
... patch bundle onto them. ... and in some ways better approach is to do an upgrade ... time for a reboot, with another reboot to back out. ... additional disks to hand). ...