Re: A request to all mail admins
From: Bruno Wolff III (bruno_at_cerberus.csd.uwm.edu)
Date: 08/28/03
- Next message: Au Naturel Productions: "Re: National Security Backdoor in telnetd - all versions."
- Previous message: Hubert Chan: "Re: A request to all mail admins"
- In reply to: Tim Haynes: "Re: A request to all mail admins"
- Next in thread: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: A request to all mail admins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Aug 2003 17:24:43 GMT
In article <86fzjmw30s.fsf@potato.vegetable.org.uk>, Tim Haynes wrote:
>
> b) bouncing virus mails is just as stupid as replying to any other kind of
> UBE - it's automation of generating replies (new mails with different
> envelopes), and is similarly moronic.
Since these messages are being detected by a virus scanner, the scanner should
know whether or not the virus forges the envelope sender or not and send
a bounce message or not accordingly. Some virus scanners actually do this.
- Next message: Au Naturel Productions: "Re: National Security Backdoor in telnetd - all versions."
- Previous message: Hubert Chan: "Re: A request to all mail admins"
- In reply to: Tim Haynes: "Re: A request to all mail admins"
- Next in thread: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: A request to all mail admins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|