Re: VPN, NAT and LDAP or FTP
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0_at_gmx.co.uk)
Date: 08/13/03
- Next message: Hal Burgiss: "Re: Possiible Kmail virus."
- Previous message: Joe Stafford: "Re: HELP Security Issue with Win 98 dual boot"
- In reply to: René Matthäi: "Re: VPN, NAT and LDAP or FTP"
- Next in thread: Les Mikesell: "Re: VPN, NAT and LDAP or FTP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:05:00 -0700
[2nd attempt - sorry if a duplicate comes through]
[comp.dcom.vpn dropped from this attempt, and may be threaded wrong]
René Matthäi wrote:
> I read information about Super FreeS/WAN, CIPE, OpenVPN (vtun) and so
OpenVPN != vtun ... but it uses the universal tun/tap driver.
> on. But I cannot see if there is at all a possibility to have VPN
> between to NATed Intranets, each VPN GW situated behind the FWs - and
I have 4 sites linked in such a way using OpenVPN. If both endpoints
have relatively static IP's and stateful firewalls, no port forwarding
is needed. Each side knows where (IP/port) to send its tunnel packets,
and the firewalls see it as an established connection.
If either endpoint has a dynamic IP, the *other* side needs to forward
the single UDP port to the internal VPN host.
> providing the capability of FTP or LDAP traffic between the intranets.
FTP works. I haven't tried LDAP so I don't know, but it should work
AFAIK. I've successfully used ssh, NFS, SMB, NTP and others.
-- /dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply
- Next message: Hal Burgiss: "Re: Possiible Kmail virus."
- Previous message: Joe Stafford: "Re: HELP Security Issue with Win 98 dual boot"
- In reply to: René Matthäi: "Re: VPN, NAT and LDAP or FTP"
- Next in thread: Les Mikesell: "Re: VPN, NAT and LDAP or FTP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
