Re: block CodeRed/Nimda at the firewall?
From: nobodaddy (nobodaddyNO_at_SPAMinbox.lv)
Date: 05/13/03
- Next message: sek_at_localhost.localdomain: "Re: Iptables and external users"
- Previous message: Juha Laiho: "Re: newbie: how to prevent troyan horses?"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: block CodeRed/Nimda at the firewall?"
- Next in thread: D. Stussy: "Re: block CodeRed/Nimda at the firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:28:30 GMT
Kasper Dupont wrote:
> nobodaddy wrote:
>> ... I just discovered the "multiport"
>> module in iptables, seems like it'd be handy for these types of things
>> (obvious attacks).
>
> I don't know how much difference it really makes
> when I just have wo port numbers.
Yeah, I was thinking more in terms of a whole truckload of the most common
trojan ports, not necessarily those two. However, I agree; for me it's
"1434" and "17300" all day long; not worth the attention. Besides, a
couple of months from now, it'll be something else... why bother?
-- The other day a dog peed on me. A bad sign. - H.L. Mencken
- Next message: sek_at_localhost.localdomain: "Re: Iptables and external users"
- Previous message: Juha Laiho: "Re: newbie: how to prevent troyan horses?"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: block CodeRed/Nimda at the firewall?"
- Next in thread: D. Stussy: "Re: block CodeRed/Nimda at the firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]