Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?
From: Wojtek Walczak (gminick_at_hacker.pl)
Date: 05/08/03
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: encrypted file system in linux like XP"
- Previous message: Torsten Kaiser: "Re: nmap question"
- In reply to: Colin J. Murphy: "Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?"
- Next in thread: Colin J. Murphy: "Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?"
- Reply: Colin J. Murphy: "Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 07:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Dnia Sun, 04 May 2003 18:37:23 GMT, Colin J. Murphy napisał(a):
> I've looked around google and c.o.l.s archives but not really found much
> specific discussion of this, which leads me to believe it's really not
> that big of a deal.
...but the question still remains: why was it changed to /bin/sh ? :>
-- [ Wojtek Walczak - gminick (at) underground.org.pl ] [ <http://gminick.linuxsecurity.pl/> ] [ "...rozmaite zwroty, matowe od patyny dawnosci." ]
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: encrypted file system in linux like XP"
- Previous message: Torsten Kaiser: "Re: nmap question"
- In reply to: Colin J. Murphy: "Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?"
- Next in thread: Colin J. Murphy: "Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?"
- Reply: Colin J. Murphy: "Re: any reason for a valid shell for httpd user?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
