Re: Performing NAT on a bridge
From: Martin Cooper (usenet_at_martinc.me.uk)
Date: 05/02/03
- Next message: Fabian Groene: "Re: root renamed!! What can I do??"
- Previous message: VMP: "Re: securely destroying data CDs"
- In reply to: Kyler Laird: "Re: Performing NAT on a bridge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 21:56:45 +0100
"Kyler Laird" <Kyler@news.Lairds.org> wrote in message
news:74q5o-m7i.ln1@news.lairds.org...
> "Jeff Umbach" <jeff@govnors.com> writes:
>
> >You cannot perform NAT on a bridge because it is a form of routing
and a
> >bridge does not do any routing, it only joins two network segments
in a
> >transparent fashion.
>
> The definition is getting fuzzy these days.
> http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/br_fw_ia/br_fw_ia.html
>
> --kyler
Hi,
That's an interesting link, I was aware of the existance of ebtables,
but had not actually read up on it. I am using a bridging firewall,
but on kernel 2.4.20, think I'll try one of the development kernels
and see what hapens. I am aware that in normal bridging this will not
work, but if I have the firewall patch, I can filter packets on source
/ destination ip address, port number etc. however, even though the
packets appear to traverse the routing chains within the firewall, any
SNAT and DNAT rules fail to work. I see no reason for this to be the
case, if the firewall can filter based on the source / destination
port and address, it seems that keeping the NAT translation table in
the kernel and performing SNAT and DNAT on one or more IP addresses
should be possible. However, when I use the rules mentioned in my
previous post, my machine effectively loses its internet connection.
The fact that after inserting these rules, the connection breaks means
that the packets must be traversing the routing chains, and something
is clearly happening. Think I'll try joining the bridging list and
see if anyone there has an opinion.
Thanks for your input,
Martin
- Next message: Fabian Groene: "Re: root renamed!! What can I do??"
- Previous message: VMP: "Re: securely destroying data CDs"
- In reply to: Kyler Laird: "Re: Performing NAT on a bridge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|