Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?
From: Kasper Dupont (kasperd_at_daimi.au.dk)
Date: 04/28/03
- Next message: Kyler Laird: "Re: recommend Linux firewalls for non-profit"
- Previous message: Jason: "DNS on the Linux iptables box"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Reply: Jem Berkes: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:03:32 +0200
Jem Berkes wrote:
>
> >> > True, but installing a new kernel may be a non-trivial problem --
> >> > for example, I have machines that have:
> >>
> >> If it makes you feel any better, even some kernel developers feel
> >> that this ptrace vulnerability isn't too big a deal considering other
> >> local vulnerabilities that still have to be squashed.
> >
> > Any references, I'd like to read more details.
>
> The only one I saw was this:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg163026.html
Threads seems to be broken there, but on google groups I was
able to follow the thread:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030322224006%246de1%40gated-at.bofh.it
>
> But he doesn't elaborate so maybe there's nothing to his claim.
He was specifically asked for examples, but never answered.
-- Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid på usenet. For sending spam use mailto:aaarep@daimi.au.dk for(_=52;_;(_%5)||(_/=5),(_%5)&&(_-=2))putchar(_);
- Next message: Kyler Laird: "Re: recommend Linux firewalls for non-profit"
- Previous message: Jason: "DNS on the Linux iptables box"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Reply: Jem Berkes: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
