Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?
From: Jem Berkes (jb_at_users.pc9.org)
Date: 04/27/03
- Next message: Kyler Laird: "Re: recommend Linux firewalls for non-profit"
- Previous message: SaPeR: "Re: postgresql & pg_shadow"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:49:18 GMT
>> > True, but installing a new kernel may be a non-trivial problem --
>> > for example, I have machines that have:
>>
>> If it makes you feel any better, even some kernel developers feel
>> that this ptrace vulnerability isn't too big a deal considering other
>> local vulnerabilities that still have to be squashed.
>
> Any references, I'd like to read more details.
The only one I saw was this:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg163026.html
But he doesn't elaborate so maybe there's nothing to his claim.
-- Jem Berkes http://www.pc-tools.net/ Windows, Linux & UNIX software
- Next message: Kyler Laird: "Re: recommend Linux firewalls for non-profit"
- Previous message: SaPeR: "Re: postgresql & pg_shadow"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Recent ptrace exploit effected by chroot?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
