Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?
From: Cyberfarer (nospam@hotmaul.com)
Date: 04/21/03
- Next message: David: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Previous message: B. Joshua Rosen: "Re: recommend Linux firewalls for non-profit"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Soeren Ziehe: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Next in thread: David: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Reply: David: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Cyberfarer" <nospam@hotmaul.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:04:50 -0400
"Soeren Ziehe" <robinton-usenet@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:8jQo4KsbY-B@robinton-gmx.ziehe.net...
> In article <4ZXja.37193$az1.26936@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>
[06 Apr 03]
> Spam Me! <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> > What's amazing is that if this is the 18+months old code red, why
> > is it still actively spreading ? Those windows boxes never get
> > cleaned and patched ???
>
> Nope. Most of the admins of these maschines haven't got a clue...
>
> Robinton
>
> --
> Was keiner kann, das kann ich auch!
Has anyone else noticed that this type of traffic really increased when the
war started?
- Next message: David: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Previous message: B. Joshua Rosen: "Re: recommend Linux firewalls for non-profit"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Soeren Ziehe: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Next in thread: David: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Reply: David: "Re: Apache log entries - hack attempt ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]