Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law
From: Kyler Laird (Kyler@news.Lairds.org)
Date: 04/08/03
- Next message: Mandy: "server hacked?"
- Previous message: Matt Gauthier: "srm point release"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Next in thread: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Kyler Laird <Kyler@news.Lairds.org> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 17:24:00 GMT
unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) writes:
>]>> I know enough about internet packets
>]>> to know that you don't get anything without someone *being able to*
>]>> figgure out where you are.
[...]
>No. Bob was certain of "someone *being able to* figgure out where you
>are"
And he's right. *You* can probably "figgure out" where you
are and you are someone. I don't see that there's much of
point to all that though.
Sure, there are probably other people who can determine
where someone sits based on a packet that he created, but I
doubt their ability has much to do with IP.
--kyler
- Next message: Mandy: "server hacked?"
- Previous message: Matt Gauthier: "srm point release"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Next in thread: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]