Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law
From: Bill Unruh (unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 04/08/03
- Next message: LHradowy: "What is /usr/lib/sa/sa1 1 1 ???"
- Previous message: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- In reply to: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Next in thread: Kyler Laird: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Reply: Kyler Laird: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Reply: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) Date: 8 Apr 2003 15:29:40 GMT
bob <jwx1.deleteThis@bellsouthnet> writes:
]"mr.e" <anjin@rogers.com> wrote in
]news:Ccnka.53931$az1.30435@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com:
]> bob wrote:
]>> I know enough about internet packets
]>> to know that you don't get anything without someone *being able to*
]>> figgure out where you are.
]>
]> The Chinese have an axiom/proverb that translated loosely says; To be
]> uncertain is to be uncomfortable but to be certain is to be a fool.
]>
]Would it be fair to translate your response as: "I can't figgure out *any*
]resonable responses to *any* of your points so maybe I can distract
]everyone with ancient Chinese proverbs that don't really have anything to
]do with the discussion"?
No. Bob was certain of "someone *being able to* figgure out where you
are"
- Next message: LHradowy: "What is /usr/lib/sa/sa1 1 1 ???"
- Previous message: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- In reply to: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Next in thread: Kyler Laird: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Reply: Kyler Laird: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Reply: bob: "Re: Anti-spoofing filters may be required by law"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|