Re: Hidden Processes
From: Dragan Cvetkovic (d1r2a3g4a5n.NOSPAM@SPAM.t6h7t.net)
From: Dragan Cvetkovic <d1r2a3g4a5n.NOSPAM@SPAM.t6h7t.net> Date: 07 Apr 2003 13:34:25 -0400
Lew_Pitcher@td.com (Lew Pitcher) writes:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:59:44 +0100, in comp.os.linux.security, "Alex Banks"
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> >"Jem Berkes" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> >> AFAIK, /proc/pid directories contain all the information on running
> >> processes. If you can read the contents of those directories, you can find
> >> all the standard info on processes though it may look more cryptic.
> >Thanks for that Jem. Unfortunately, there is no /proc/pid dir on my new
> Are you sure that your /etc/fstab contains a line to mount the procfs? It
> should look like
> none /proc proc defaults 0 0
Or it might be that Alex was simply looking for /proc/pid directory. There
is no such things. What is meant is e.g. /proc/738 which is a directory
correspoonding to the pid 738.
Is there Linux nowdays without procfs? In the old days, procfs was optional
and there were two sets of ps: one that supported /proc and the other which
did work without it.
-- Dragan Cvetkovic, To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer