Re: Problem with Samba and iptables
From: Jeremy Gray (gray@euthanasia.ath.cx)
Date: 03/20/03
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: Firewall hits from websites"
- Previous message: Nada Lada: "Re: Problem with Samba and iptables"
- In reply to: Nada Lada: "Re: Problem with Samba and iptables"
- Next in thread: Whoever: "Re: Problem with Samba and iptables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Jeremy Gray <gray@euthanasia.ath.cx> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:42:39 GMT
Nada Lada <nadalada@linux.lan> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:17:16 -0700, Jeremy Gray wrote:
>>
>> So, you could allow all packets destined for 192.168.0.0/24 in your
>> samba rules or just 192.168.0.255 for a 255.255.255.0 netmask.
>> Either way your firewall will allow incoming packets destined for the
>> broadcast address.
>
> If I'm following your reasoning, where I originally have the source as
> $INTRANET (192.168.0.0/24) and the destination as $IPADDR
> (192.168.0.1), I should change the destination to $INTRANET as well.
> My goal is to only accept packets that originate on my internal
> network. Am I on correct here?
Yeah. That looks good.
-- Jeremy A. Gray gray@metacomet.net "Remember the Pueblo." -- the Fourth Law of Marvin
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: Firewall hits from websites"
- Previous message: Nada Lada: "Re: Problem with Samba and iptables"
- In reply to: Nada Lada: "Re: Problem with Samba and iptables"
- Next in thread: Whoever: "Re: Problem with Samba and iptables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|