Re: Port Scans and Prelude
From: Robert Tinsley (rjt@please.follow-up.to.group)
Date: 02/27/03
- Next message: David: "Re: Apache log entries"
- Previous message: Tantor: "Re: iptables Timed Port Block?"
- In reply to: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Robert Tinsley" <rjt@please.follow-up.to.group> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:26:35 +0000
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:19:21 +0000, Robert Tinsley wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:03:23 -0500, David D. Huff Jr. wrote:
>> Oh, come now, look at the ports he mentioned "1101 to 11136".
>
> uhhh... yeah... and?
ah, think i got your point. the scan wasn't against all 10,000 ports, but
all ports scanned were in that range. from another post by the OP...
:Enumerating ports 1112-111119
:Quick Description Scanning attack
:Date Tue Feb 25 08:10:55 2003
:Kind Should be ok
:Received 1 time
:Message Udp scanning attempt: 39 cnx from port 1112 to 11119 in 13 seconds
(i assume that 'cnx' stands for 'connections' or 'connection attempts')
-- rjt at thzpoachzr dot nzt (replace "z"s with "e"s)
- Next message: David: "Re: Apache log entries"
- Previous message: Tantor: "Re: iptables Timed Port Block?"
- In reply to: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|