Re: Port Scans and Prelude
From: Robert Tinsley (rjt@please.follow-up.to.group)
Date: 02/27/03
- Next message: Tantor: "Re: iptables Timed Port Block?"
- Previous message: Steve Webster: "Re: iptables Timed Port Block?"
- In reply to: David D. Huff Jr.: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Next in thread: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Reply: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Robert Tinsley" <rjt@please.follow-up.to.group> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:19:21 +0000
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:03:23 -0500, David D. Huff Jr. wrote:
> Robert Tinsley wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:57:09 -0500, David D. Huff Jr. wrote:
>>
>>>Hmm, why would their DNS be hitting different ports?
>>
>> because the client will generally send different requests from different ports.
>>
>
> Oh, come now, look at the ports he mentioned "1101 to 11136".
uhhh... yeah... and?
-- rjt at thzpoachzr dot nzt (replace "z"s with "e"s)
- Next message: Tantor: "Re: iptables Timed Port Block?"
- Previous message: Steve Webster: "Re: iptables Timed Port Block?"
- In reply to: David D. Huff Jr.: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Next in thread: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Reply: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|