SSL for SMTP and POP3
From: Jem Berkes (jb@users.pc9.org)
Date: 02/13/03
- Next message: Whoever: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Previous message: killerkit: "Re: Start linux without login prompt"
- Next in thread: Whoever: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Reply: Whoever: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Jem Berkes <jb@users.pc9.org> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 04:54:25 GMT
I'm developing a POP3 and SMTP capable mail client, and I'm trying to
support the most common form of SSL protected POP3 and SMTP.
I know that some ISPs simply provide alternate ports (pop3s=995, smtps=
465) that are SSL only. But there also seems to be a way of converting a
regular plaintext channel into an SSL.
Which way is the most common? Is one on its way out, the other in?
I found RFC 2595 which describes the 'STLS' command for POP3, which lets
the client and server do a SSL/TLS negotiation to switch to secure
channel.
And RFC 3207 describes the 'STARTTLS' command for SMTP.
I have found ISPs (including my own) that support one or more of
everything mentioned above. Any idea, from your experience, what is more
common? From a security standpoint they all seem OK to me.
-- Jem Berkes http://www.pc-tools.net/ Windows, Linux & UNIX software
- Next message: Whoever: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Previous message: killerkit: "Re: Start linux without login prompt"
- Next in thread: Whoever: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Reply: Whoever: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: SSL for SMTP and POP3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|