Re: weird scans from port 80
From: Fredderic (fredderic@iprimus.com.au)
Date: 01/29/03
- Next message: Fredderic: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- Previous message: Fredderic: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- Next in thread: Silviu Minut: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Fredderic" <fredderic@iprimus.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 23:26:51 +1000
> From RFC 793 page 36:
> As a general rule, reset (RST) must be sent whenever a segment
> arrives which apparently is not intended for the current connection.
In a perfect world, DROP would be unnecesary.
Unfortunately, this ain't a perfect world.
So stick your RFC's where they fit, and try to help the person with a
realisitic answer. THEN you can point out why it's evil with my and
everyone else's heart-felt blessing.
- Next message: Fredderic: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- Previous message: Fredderic: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- Next in thread: Silviu Minut: "Re: weird scans from port 80"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|